South Fork Intellectual Property Lawyer, Colorado

Sponsored Law Firm


Ruth M Acheson

Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  39 Years

Ruth M. Acheson

Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  39 Years

J Michael Musick

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  30 Years

James Michael Musick

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  30 Years
Speak with Lawyer.com

Mary Katharine Hayes

General Practice
Status:  Inactive           Licensed:  26 Years

Gordon H Rowe

General Practice
Status:  Inactive           Licensed:  75 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Lawyer.com can help you easily and quickly find South Fork Intellectual Property Lawyers and South Fork Intellectual Property Law Firms. Refine your search by specific Intellectual Property practice areas such as Copyright, International Intellectual Property, Patent and Trademark matters.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Cinemark USA, Inc. v. Seest

... Cinemark's primary contention on appeal is that, under the totality of the circumstances, its transactions with film distributors for the use of motion picture film reels are not taxable events because they involve intangible, intellectual property rights rather than tangible personal ...

STEWARD SOFTWARE CO. v. KOPCHO

... The complaint defined "the Property" as "the software as well as [a website and associated domain names], the source code, the object code, all software documentation, [certain marketing materials] for which it ha[d] paid and the associated intellectual property rights." In their ...

MAKOTO USA, INC. v. Russell

... being stolen. Indeed, even in its appellate brief, plaintiff continues to maintain that its claims arise from defendants' "failure to transfer title to all of the intellectual property as represented in the parties' Asset Purchase Agreement.". ...