within 300 miles of Hartsel practice in Intellectual Property Colorado

Huffman Law Group, P.C.

International Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property

Holland & Hart

Litigation, Intellectual Property, Class Action, Business, Construction

Law Office of Mark Levy

Intellectual Property

Pannell Law, Llc

Business & Trade, Trusts, Copyright, International Intellectual Property, Patent

Martensen IP

Administrative Law, International Intellectual Property, Business, Lawsuit & Dispute, Intellectual Property

Stuart W. Mckinlay, P.C.

Real Estate, Accident & Injury, Intellectual Property, Business

Hanes & Bartels LLC

Litigation, Real Estate, Intellectual Property, Contract, Immigration

Sanders Law Firm

Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Business, Accident & Injury, Intellectual Property

Bl Speer & Associates

Entertainment, Science, Technology & Internet, Copyright, International Intellectual Property, Patent

The Doherty Law Firm

Real Estate, Business & Trade, Trusts, Copyright, Litigation

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Cinemark USA, Inc. v. Seest

... Cinemark's primary contention on appeal is that, under the totality of the circumstances, its transactions with film distributors for the use of motion picture film reels are not taxable events because they involve intangible, intellectual property rights rather than tangible personal ...


... The complaint defined "the Property" as "the software as well as [a website and associated domain names], the source code, the object code, all software documentation, [certain marketing materials] for which it ha[d] paid and the associated intellectual property rights." In their ...

MAKOTO USA, INC. v. Russell

... being stolen. Indeed, even in its appellate brief, plaintiff continues to maintain that its claims arise from defendants' "failure to transfer title to all of the intellectual property as represented in the parties' Asset Purchase Agreement.". ...