By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McDonald v. State

... Nor did the Superior Court's ruling explain why those facts were relevant, since Corporal Hake did not stop the motor vehicle for any of those reasons. Fourth Amendment and Traffic Violations. ... Traffic Violation as Probable Cause. ...

Loper v. State

... [6] Questions of law are reviewed de novo, [7] and questions of fact are reviewed for "clear error." [8]. I. Did the Police Have Reasonable And Articulable Suspicion to Detain Loper Beyond The Initial Traffic Stop? ... A. The Police Did Not Exceed The Scope Of The Traffic Stop. ...

State v. Rickards

... Heath test. The first question is whether the stop was pretextual. Captain Layfield testified that he stopped the vehicle because it was standing still in a travel lane in front of his private driveway, which is a traffic violation. He also ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Newark Traffic Lawyer, Delaware

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jerome M. Capone

Andrew D. Rahaim

Gary L. Smith

Thomas A. Foley

Edmund Daniel Lyons

TIPS

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McDonald v. State

Loper v. State

State v. Rickards

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details