Plaintiff Claimed Hotel Failed to protect Concrete Walkway

by Alexis Galindo on May. 25, 2020

Real Estate Real Estate Other Accident & Injury  Car Accident Accident & Injury  Personal Injury 

Summary: Attorneys Alex Galindo and Richard Wynn with Curd, Galindo & Smith, LLP Announces Orange County Jury Awards $1,600,000 in Personal Injury Claim in the matter entitled Khuong Nguyen v. Peninsula Hotel Management, LLC dba Ramada Plaza Hotel and Dzung Truong, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2010-00387330.

Court records show that on March 5, 2010, plaintiff Khoung Nguyen, 43, a video editor/cameraman,
represented by Alex Galindoof Curd, Galindo & Smith, LLP, had plans to attend a business meeting at a restaurant known as the Mini Rex Bar & Grill in theRamada Plaza Hotel in Garden Grove. While at the Mini Rex, Nguyen stepped outside to have a cigarette near the north side entrance. At the same time, Dzung Truong, who was driving a 2004 Jeep Liberty with his wife as a passenger, was attempting to park in a handicap parking space near the north entrance of the hotel when his vehicle continued up and over the parking space curb, onto the concrete walkway and pinned Nguyen against the hotel's north wall. Nguyen sustained significant injuries to his legs including a fractured hip.
Nguyen sued Truong and the operator of the Ramada Plaza Hotel, Peninsula Hotel Management, LLC. He alleged that Truong was negligent in the operation of his vehicle and that the hotel was negligent for failing to properly maintain the area, creating a dangerous condition.
Peninsula Hotel Management bought the Ramada Plaza Hotel in 2003 and performed some renovations to the subject property in an effort to bring it into compliance with the requirements of Ramada International.

Court documents indicated that Nguyen was smoking in what he claimed he and any reasonable person would believe to be the hotel's designated smoking area. The north side entrance has an ashtray and a bench located on a concrete walkway, which is immediately next to handicapped parking spaces. The west entrance also had an ashtray and bench similar to the north entrance. Plaintiff's counsel noted that the ashtray and bench were maintained by the hotel's housekeeping staff to accommodate the hotel and restaurant guests. Based on court documents, Nguyen's counsel claimed that Peninsula Hotel Management failed to protect its guests from a foreseeable danger by failing to install, at a minimal expense, protective measures along the concrete walkway at the north and west entrances.

Mr. Galindo also claimed that Peninsula Hotel Management was negligent per se, as it failed to comply with Garden Grove Municipal Code§ B3, which states that safety barriers, protective bumpers or curbings, and directional markers shall be provided to assure pedestrian and vehicular safety, efficient utilization, and protection to landscaping, as well as to prevent encroachment onto adjoining public or private property. Plaintiff's counsel argued that the failure to comply with the municipal code led to insufficient protection to assure that vehicles not encroach onto the walkway andinto the designated smoking area where Nguyen was injured. Mr. Galindo also argued that this failure was a violation of the Garden Grove municipal code and was a substantial cause of Nguyen's injuries. Nguyen requested, and was given, the negligence per se jury instruction.

The hotel's counsel, David Belofsky argued that the Peninsula Hotel Management had no duty since the area of impact was not an area of congregation and, therefore, did not require protection. Mr. Belofsky further argued that the hotel had complied with the code as it had a curb protecting the area of impact. Truong accepted liability. His counsel, Ms. Roth noted that the Truong's insurer offered its policy limit of $15,000, which was not accepted by plaintiff's counsel when the matter went to trial. Defense counsel moved for summary judgment based on whether or not the area of impact was a known area on congregation, but it was denied.

INJURIES/DAMAGES: emotional distress; fracture, acetabulum; fracture, patella; internal fixation; open reduction; physical therapy; pins and rods. As a result of the impact, Nguyen suffered a left open patella fracture, right open tibiofibular fracture and left acetabulum wall fracture. He was taken from the scene to UCI Medical Center, where he underwent immediate open repair of the right ankle with the insertion of pins and rods. Three days later, he had the acetabular repair performed, also with internal fixation. Defendant Ramada Plaza Hotel was represented by David Belofsky with the firm of Belofsky & Hanker, Torrance, CA and Dzung Truong was represnted by Heath Rothof Parker Strauss, LLP Glendale, CA.

RESULT The trial was bifurcated, with the same jury for both the liability and damages portions. The jury found Truong 75 percent liable for the accident and Peninsula Hotel Management 25 percent liable. Thus, it awarded Nguyen $1,600,037.44 in total damages.

Follow this case and other Curd, Galindo & Smith, LLP, cases on Facebook.

Curd, Galindo & Smith, LLP is a full service law firm that includes practice areas of bankruptcy, criminal law,estate planning, civil business litigation, personal injury, product liability and police misconduct. The firm represents both corporate and individual clients of all sizes and those who have been seriously injured or have lost a family member due to an accident, defective product, police misconduct or negligence. The law firm has recovered millions of dollars for its thousands of clients since 1995 by winning complex and challenging business disputes, death and injury cases involving police misconduct, traffic collisions, work place injuries and defective products, including defective automobiles, against some of the world's largest companies and governmental agencies



Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See's full Terms of Use for more information.