Bold Immigration Proposal in the U.S. Senate

by Eliza Grinberg on Nov. 05, 2019

Immigration Immigration  Deportation Immigration  Visa 

Summary: I recently received an email from the Immigrant’s List about an interesting new piece of immigration legislation being considered by the U.S. Senate.The legislation is being supported by Immigrant’s List founding board member Ira J.Kurzban, one of the preeminent scholars of U.S. immigration law.

immigration attorney nycI recently received an email from the Immigrant's List about an interesting new piece of immigration legislation being considered by the U.S. Senate. The legislation is being supported by Immigrant's List founding board member Ira J. Kurzban, one of the preeminent scholars of U.S. immigration law.

Introduced by Senate Minority Whip Richard Durbin (D-IL) on October 16, 2019, Senate Bill 2603 (RELIEF Act) [see here] would make several important changes to immigration law. According to the email from Immigrant's List, it would, among other things:

- End the green card backlog for family-sponsored and employment-based petitions over the course of five years;
- Classify spouses and children of lawful permanent residents as immediate relatives;
- Exempt derivative beneficiaries of employment-based preference petitions from annual visa number limits;
- Protect “aging out” children who qualify for permanent resident status based on a parent's petition; and
- Lift per-country visa number caps.

Senate Bill 2603 follows HR 1044, passed by the U.S. House of Representatives. That legislation focused on using all available visas in the skilled worker categories over the next decade to ameliorate the backlog of applicants from India. Ira Kurzban opposed HR 1044 as it stood in an op-ed linked to from the Immigrant's List website [link]. Senate Bill 2603, which goes quite a bit further and would benefit a wider swath of prospective immigrants than HR 1044, made enough changes to earn his support.

Regardless of the merits, Senate Bill 2603 faces uncertain prospects in Congress, and it is unclear whether President Donald Trump would be open to signing it even if it passed through Congress. Senator Durbin asked for unanimous consent to pass Senate Bill 2603 on October 16, 2019, but his bid failed when Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) objected.[1] Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) is sponsoring Senate Bill 386, parallel legislation to HR 1044 focusing on the backlog of Indian employment-based applications. While Kurzban and Immigrant's List opposed Senate Bill 386, they were amenable to legislation proposed by Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) to raise the number of available employment-based visas and give limited priority to healthcare workers in rural areas [link]. You may read Senator Paul's proposal, “the BELIEVE Act,” here [PDF version].

We will update the website with more information on important immigration legislation as it becomes available.

You can learn more about Immigrant's List and sign up for its email list at

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

1. Vaughan, M. Jessica. “Senate Action on Big Tech Green Card Bill S.366/S.2603.” Center for Immigration Studies. Oct. 17, 2019.

Lawyer website:

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See's full Terms of Use for more information.